Meta-Analysis Calculator
Combine results from multiple A/B tests to estimate the true effect size with greater precision. Uses inverse-variance weighted fixed-effects meta-analysis.
Only pool genuinely comparable effects.
Every row must use the same metric and effect scale and include its actual standard error. Lift plus sample size is not enough. This fixed-effect result assumes one common true effect and should not be treated as universal across different brands, pages, devices, or audiences.
Results
Pooled Effect
4.74%
weighted average lift
95% CI
[2.35, 7.13]
confidence interval
p-value
0.0001
Heterogeneity
I² Statistic
0.0%
Low heterogeneity
Cochran's Q
0.57
Study Breakdown
| Study | Effect (%) | Weight | Contribution |
|---|---|---|---|
| Test 1 | 5.20% | 33.7% | |
| Test 2 | 3.80% | 45.9% | |
| Test 3 | 6.10% | 20.4% | |
| Pooled | 4.74% | 100% |
You just ran the numbers. Where will the result live?
A calculator answers one question and forgets it. GrowthLayer keeps each test your team saves — the hypothesis, the numbers, and the decision — so future planning can start from a reviewable record.
- Structured history of saved experiments
- Import results from CSV in one step
- Program summaries across saved tests
- Free to start — no card required
Methodology
Frequently Asked Questions
What is meta-analysis in A/B testing?
When should I combine A/B test results?
What is heterogeneity and why does it matter?
What is the difference between fixed and random effects models?
How many studies do I need for a meta-analysis?
Related Calculators
Choosing a method or double-checking another tool? Compare 11 public A/B test calculators and download the evidence matrix.
Updated for 2026. Built by GrowthLayer — built for evidence-aware experimentation teams.