Skip to main content
winner+5.3% lift

Checkout: Multiple Steps

Hypothesis

If we implement Multiple Steps on checkout pages, then conversion rate will improve because this is a repeatedly validated UX pattern.

Test Results

Key Learning

Problem: Friction during the checkout process causes users to abandon right when they're closest to converting.

What worked: has been validated across multiple real A/B tests. The evidence (8.0) suggests it is Almost Certainly better. Use this as a high-priority test hypothesis backed by industry meta-analysis. (+5.3% lift)

Takeaway: A meaningful improvement that compounds with other optimizations. Layout wins often unlock further opportunities — isolate which specific element drove the lift for even larger gains.

How to Apply This to Your Site

This experiment demonstrated that checkout: multiple steps can produce a +5.3% improvement in conversions. The test was run on a checkout page in the cross-industry industry.

Before you test: Consider that layout tests typically require adequate traffic to reach statistical significance. Run your test for at least 2 full business cycles to account for weekly traffic patterns.

This result reached 95% statistical confidence, meaning there is a very low probability the observed effect was due to chance. Results at this confidence level are generally considered reliable for making business decisions.

What Was Tested

Testing whether Multiple Steps improves conversion performance. Based on 8.0 evidence points, version B is Almost Certainly better. Applicable to checkout, home-landing, listing, product, shopping-cart, signup page types.

Methodology

Confidence Level
95%
Lift Range
2.6% to 7.9%

Build On These Learnings

Save your own experiments, spot winning patterns across your test history, and stop repeating what's already been tried.

Related Experiments

Explore More Experiments