Skip to main content

Homepage A/B Test Ideas

Candidate changes for a local evidence-informed backlog. No idea below carries a predicted lift or a promise that another result will transfer to your users.

6 candidate changes3 lower-effort implementations

Start With the Problem

Use quantitative evidence to locate the problem: exposure, conversion, error, latency, funnel, and segment data. Use qualitative evidence to explain it: moderated usability, interviews, open-text surveys, support themes, and session review.

Keep those evidence types separate. Qualitative research can strengthen the mechanism; it cannot prove that a design change caused an outcome.

Write the Decision Before the Test

Document the audience, control, variant, behavioral mechanism, primary metric, guardrails, MDE, sample size, allocation, analysis method, exclusions, SRM response, and stopping rule. Timestamp the plan so later decisions can be audited.

Candidate Changes

Treat each card as a prompt. Keep only ideas connected to a documented local problem.

1.Hero Headline Clarity

Easy effort

Test benefit-oriented vs. feature-oriented hero headlines. Focus on what the visitor gets, not what the product does.

Candidate change only. Define a local problem, mechanism, and decision metric before testing.

Save this idea to your backlog

2.Use Case Navigation

Medium effort

Test presenting use-case-based navigation ("I want to...") vs. product-category-based navigation ("Products > Features").

Candidate change only. Define a local problem, mechanism, and decision metric before testing.

Save this idea to your backlog

3.Social Proof Above the Fold

Easy effort

Test showing customer logos, review counts, or a key testimonial in the hero area vs. below the fold.

Candidate change only. Define a local problem, mechanism, and decision metric before testing.

Save this idea to your backlog

4.Primary CTA Optimization

Easy effort

Test CTA copy (action-oriented vs. generic), button design (color contrast, size), and placement on the homepage.

Candidate change only. Define a local problem, mechanism, and decision metric before testing.

Save this idea to your backlog

5.Navigation Simplification

Medium effort

Test reducing main navigation items, grouping under fewer top-level categories, or using mega-menu vs. simple dropdown.

Candidate change only. Define a local problem, mechanism, and decision metric before testing.

Save this idea to your backlog

6.Mobile Homepage Layout

Medium effort

Test a mobile-specific homepage layout with thumb-zone CTAs, simplified hero, and prioritized content hierarchy.

Candidate change only. Define a local problem, mechanism, and decision metric before testing.

Save this idea to your backlog

Frequently Asked Questions

Which homepage A/B test should I run first?

Start with the largest decision-relevant problem supported by local behavioral data and user research. Implementation ease is useful for sequencing, but it is not evidence of impact.

What lift should I expect from these ideas?

No transferable lift is claimed. Set an MDE from business value and available traffic, then measure the effect in your own population.

What makes the result trustworthy?

A trustworthy result needs a documented hypothesis, primary metric, arm-level counts, planned sample size, allocation and SRM checks, analysis method, stopping rule, and a record of any mid-test changes.

Build the Full Experiment Plan

Calculate sample size and document the metrics, guardrails, and stopping rule before engineering begins.

Open the experiment planner

Related Planning Pages

More Page Types