Skip to main content
inconclusive

Checkout: Progress Bar

Hypothesis

If we implement 'Progress Bar' on checkout pages (In this experiment, a breadcrumb was replaced with a circular progress bar (arguably more visible overall steps; but less visible/clickable accomplished steps)), then key conversion metrics will improve.

Test Results

37,683
Sample size

Key Learning

Context: The primary call-to-action on the checkout isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

What was tested: REAL-WORLD TEST: 'Progress Bar' was tested on a live checkout page. The test involved 37,683 real visitors. Full statistical results require paid access. Test methodology: In this experiment, a breadcrumb was replaced with a circular progress bar (arguably more visible overall steps; but less visible/clickable accomplish...

Result: No statistically significant difference was detected. Navigation tests that don't show a difference may indicate the issue is content findability, not menu structure. Consider search and filtering improvements.

How to Apply This to Your Site

This experiment tested checkout: progress bar but produced no statistically significant change. The test was run on a checkout page in the cross-industry industry. Inconclusive results suggest this particular change may not be a priority — focus testing effort on higher-impact areas.

Before you test: Consider that navigation tests typically require large sample sizes to detect small effects. Run your test for at least 2 full business cycles to account for weekly traffic patterns.

What Was Tested

In this experiment, a breadcrumb was replaced with a circular progress bar (arguably more visible overall steps; but less visible/clickable accomplished steps). Impact on transactions was measured.

Methodology

Confidence Level
70%

Build On These Learnings

Save your own experiments, spot winning patterns across your test history, and stop repeating what's already been tried.

Related Experiments

Explore More Experiments