Skip to main content
inconclusive

Content Page: Nagging Results on Content Page

Hypothesis

If we persistently show social proof results across sessions, then conversion rates will improve because repeated exposure to outcomes reinforces trust and decision confidence

LayoutContent PageCross-Industrycontent-pagedesktopnaggingnudge

Test Results

131,642
Sample size

Key Learning

Context: Users on the content page need validation from others before committing — without visible proof of success, they hesitate.

What was tested: Persistent social proof across multiple touchpoints can build cumulative trust, though over-exposure risks fatigue; optimal frequency depends on session depth and engagement level With 131,642 visitors, this test has solid statistical power.

Result: No statistically significant difference was detected. This null result is still valuable — it narrows the search space and helps calibrate your minimum detectable effect for future tests.

How to Apply This to Your Site

This experiment tested content page: nagging results on content page but produced no statistically significant change. The test was run on a content page page in the cross-industry industry. Inconclusive results suggest this particular change may not be a priority — focus testing effort on higher-impact areas.

Before you test: Consider that layout tests typically require large sample sizes to detect small effects. Run your test for at least 2 full business cycles to account for weekly traffic patterns.

What Was Tested

In this experiment, blog article pages were hidden behind a registration wall - requing a signup to access. The registration wall would appear after the first paragraph using gradual opacity to cover the rest of the article. We have published the effects of this change on registrations (signups) and on engagement (users viewing other more important company detail pages).

Methodology

Confidence Level
70%

Build On These Learnings

Save your own experiments, spot winning patterns across your test history, and stop repeating what's already been tried.

Related Experiments

Explore More Experiments