Skip to main content
loser

Product: CTA Button Optimization

Hypothesis

If we test a similar change on our product pages as Bol.com rejected, we should be cautious

CTAProduct PageE-commerceindustry_leakbolcomloser

Test Results

Key Learning

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

What was tried: Bol.com rejected this UI change (Jan 2, 2023). Rejection suggests the change underperformed the control

Why it failed: Not every CTA change improves conversion. Users may have preferred the original because it was clearer, more familiar, or better positioned.

How to Apply This to Your Site

This test showed that product: cta button optimization hurt conversions. The change was tested on a product page page in the e-commerce industry. Avoid replicating this exact approach — instead, consider testing the opposite direction or a more subtle variation.

Before you test: Consider that cta tests typically require adequate traffic to reach statistical significance. Run your test for at least 2 full business cycles to account for weekly traffic patterns.

What Was Tested

After detecting some success with a more padded button, Bol continued their a/b test iteration. The Dutch online retailer ran an experiment with an even wider add-to-cart button on their product pages.

Methodology

Confidence Level
70%

Build On These Learnings

Save your own experiments, spot winning patterns across your test history, and stop repeating what's already been tried.

Related Experiments

Explore More Experiments