Skip to main content

CTA A/B Test Results

A/B tests on call-to-action buttons, links, and conversion triggers. See which CTA patterns drive more clicks and conversions.

78
Experiments
29%
Win rate
+34.7%
Avg. winner lift
23
Winners found

Key Findings: CTA A/B Tests

Across 78 cta experiments, 29% resulted in a statistically significant win. Winning variants saw an average lift of +34.7%. Meanwhile, 7 tests underperformed the control with an average drop of -8.3%.

48 experiments were inconclusive, meaning the difference between control and variant was not statistically significant. Inconclusive results are still valuable — they tell you what doesn't move the needle, so you can focus testing effort elsewhere.

These results come from real A/B tests with sample sizes ranging from hundreds to millions of visitors. Use them to inform your own cta testing strategy and avoid repeating experiments that have already been run.

Outcome Breakdown

Top 30 of 78 Experiments

inconclusive

Product: Inverted Or Consistent Button Styles

Context: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry
inconclusive

Listing: Hover Button

Context: The primary call-to-action on the listing isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry
inconclusive

Product: Shortcut Buttons

Context: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry
inconclusive

Product: Buy Now Or Smaller Commitment Button

Context: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry
inconclusive

Checkout: Back Buttons

Context: The primary call-to-action on the checkout isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industryn=22,852
inconclusive

Listing: Hover Button

Context: The primary call-to-action on the listing isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industryn=30,699
inconclusive

Landing Page: Order Now CTA

Context: The primary call-to-action on the landing page isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTAEnergy & Utilitiesn=0
inconclusive

Checkout: Above The Fold Call To Action

Context: The first screen of the checkout must immediately communicate value — if it doesn't, users bounce before scrolling.

CTACross-Industry
winner

Does Pinning a Mobile Checkout CTA Improve Conversion?

Sticky mobile CTAs can compress time-on-page meaningfully (~15% faster) without sacrificing engagement signals — users converted at a directionally higher rate AND moved through the page faster, suggesting reduced hesitation rather than rushed clicks. The result was shipped via 90/10 holdout monitoring rather than traditional 50/50 A/B inference — the high baseline (~85%) and limited mobile traffic made full A/B underpowered, so the team chose a holdout-validated rollout as the deliberate methodology. Bayesian P(variant > control) was ~0.90, supporting the directional ship call. Worth noting: external research flags sticky CTAs as context-dependent — they help when the primary action is buried below the fold, but can hurt on shorter pages where the original CTA is already visible.

CTAEnergy & Utilities
inconclusive

Product: Single Or Alternative Buttons

Context: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry
inconclusive

Listing: Above The Fold Call To Action

Context: The first screen of the listing must immediately communicate value — if it doesn't, users bounce before scrolling.

CTACross-Industryn=823
inconclusive

Listing: Centered Forms & Buttons

Context: The primary call-to-action on the listing isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industryn=207,844
inconclusive

Content Page: Links Or Buttons on Content Page

Context: The primary call-to-action on the content page isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industryn=98,697
inconclusive

Content Page: Sticky Call To Action on Content Page

Context: Key actions on the content page disappear as users scroll, creating a gap between intent and the ability to act.

CTACross-Industryn=7,999
inconclusive

Content Page: Repeated Bottom Call To Action on Content Page

Context: The primary call-to-action on the content page isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industryn=108,360
inconclusive

Content Page: Inline Link Nudge on Content Page

Context: The primary call-to-action on the content page isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industryn=411,288
inconclusive

Content Page: Contrast Links & Buttons on Content Page

Context: The primary call-to-action on the content page isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industryn=142,102
inconclusive

Content Page: Inline Link Nudge on Content Page

Context: The primary call-to-action on the content page isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industryn=67,295
inconclusive

Content Page: Inline Link Nudge on Content Page

Context: The primary call-to-action on the content page isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industryn=10,258
inconclusive

Product: Sticky Call To Action on Product Page

Context: Key actions on the product disappear as users scroll, creating a gap between intent and the ability to act.

CTACross-Industryn=805,623
inconclusive

Listing: Shortcut Buttons

Context: The primary call-to-action on the listing isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industryn=43,967
inconclusive

Listing: Visible Availability

Context: The primary call-to-action on the listing isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industryn=279,266
inconclusive

Listing: Links Or Buttons

Context: The primary call-to-action on the listing isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industryn=386,439
inconclusive

Listing: Visible Payment Options

Context: The primary call-to-action on the listing isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry
loser

Does Adding a Shopping CTA to the Main Navigation Drive Plan Views?

A CTA's click rate is not its conversion contribution. This test surfaced one of the most consistently underweighted patterns in CRO: behavioral diagnostics almost always tell a more honest story than the topline. The aggregate result looked like a tiny non-significant lift (+1%); the diagnostic revealed that of every 100 button clicks, only 6 reached the next funnel step. Two failure modes converged: (1) copy intent mismatch — the chosen label read as 'create account' rather than 'shop,' so a large share of clicks came from users trying to log in / manage their account from support and customer pages; (2) extra modal step before the destination page added friction without value. The aggregate lift was partially cannibalization from higher-converting paths. The transferable pattern: when introducing a global navigation element, validate the click→conversion ratio per source page, not just the topline. High clicks from low-intent pages creates a false signal of engagement that can mask poor performance.

CTAEnergy & Utilities
inconclusive

Listing: Sticky Call To Action

Context: Key actions on the listing disappear as users scroll, creating a gap between intent and the ability to act.

CTACross-Industryn=1,057,325
inconclusive

Listing: Single Or Alternative Buttons

Context: The primary call-to-action on the listing isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industryn=1,416,128
inconclusive

Listing: Action Button

Context: The primary call-to-action on the listing isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industryn=7,173
inconclusive

Listing: Repeated Bottom Call To Action

Context: The primary call-to-action on the listing isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industryn=106,791
inconclusive

Product: Repeated Bottom Call To Action

Context: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry

Browse More

Run Better CTA Tests

Save your own experiments, get AI-powered test ideas, and build on patterns from 78+ real tests.

View Plans & Pricing