Skip to main content

CTA A/B Test Results

A/B tests on call-to-action buttons, links, and conversion triggers. See which CTA patterns drive more clicks and conversions.

30
Experiments
33%
Win rate
10
Winners found

Key Findings: CTA A/B Tests

Across 30 cta experiments, 33% resulted in a statistically significant win. Meanwhile, 5 tests underperformed the control.

15 experiments were inconclusive, meaning the difference between control and variant was not statistically significant. Inconclusive results are still valuable — they tell you what doesn't move the needle, so you can focus testing effort elsewhere.

These results come from real A/B tests with sample sizes ranging from hundreds to millions of visitors. Use them to inform your own cta testing strategy and avoid repeating experiments that have already been run.

Outcome Breakdown

All 30 Experiments

winner

Does Pinning a Mobile Checkout CTA Improve Conversion?

Sticky mobile CTAs can compress time-on-page meaningfully (~15% faster) without sacrificing engagement signals — users converted at a directionally higher rate AND moved through the page faster, suggesting reduced hesitation rather than rushed clicks. The result was shipped via 90/10 holdout monitoring rather than traditional 50/50 A/B inference — the high baseline (~85%) and limited mobile traffic made full A/B underpowered, so the team chose a holdout-validated rollout as the deliberate methodology. Bayesian P(variant > control) was ~0.90, supporting the directional ship call. Worth noting: external research flags sticky CTAs as context-dependent — they help when the primary action is buried below the fold, but can hurt on shorter pages where the original CTA is already visible.

CTAEnergy & Utilities
inconclusive

Listing: Visible Payment Options

Context: The primary call-to-action on the listing isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry
loser

Does Adding a Shopping CTA to the Main Navigation Drive Plan Views?

A CTA's click rate is not its conversion contribution. This test surfaced one of the most consistently underweighted patterns in CRO: behavioral diagnostics almost always tell a more honest story than the topline. The aggregate result looked like a tiny non-significant lift (+1%); the diagnostic revealed that of every 100 button clicks, only 6 reached the next funnel step. Two failure modes converged: (1) copy intent mismatch — the chosen label read as 'create account' rather than 'shop,' so a large share of clicks came from users trying to log in / manage their account from support and customer pages; (2) extra modal step before the destination page added friction without value. The aggregate lift was partially cannibalization from higher-converting paths. The transferable pattern: when introducing a global navigation element, validate the click→conversion ratio per source page, not just the topline. High clicks from low-intent pages creates a false signal of engagement that can mask poor performance.

CTAEnergy & Utilities
inconclusive

Product: Single Or Alternative Buttons

Context: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry
inconclusive

Checkout: Above The Fold Call To Action

Context: The first screen of the checkout must immediately communicate value — if it doesn't, users bounce before scrolling.

CTACross-Industry
inconclusive

Product: Shortcut Buttons

Context: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry
inconclusive

Product: Buy Now Or Smaller Commitment Button

Context: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry
inconclusive

Listing: Hover Button

Context: The primary call-to-action on the listing isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry
inconclusive

Product: Inverted Or Consistent Button Styles

Context: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry
inconclusive

Product: Repeated Bottom Call To Action

Context: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry
winner

Checkout: Filled Or Ghost Buttons

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the checkout isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry
inconclusive

Product: Benefit Button

Context: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry
inconclusive

Checkout: No Commitment Default

Context: Friction during the checkout process causes users to abandon right when they're closest to converting.

CTACross-Industry
inconclusive

Product: Action Button

Context: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry
inconclusive

Checkout: Back Buttons

Context: The primary call-to-action on the checkout isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry
inconclusive

Product: Contrast Links & Buttons

Context: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry
inconclusive

Listing: Links Or Buttons

Context: The primary call-to-action on the listing isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry
inconclusive

Product: Square or Rounded Buttons

Context: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry
winner

Product: Product Page

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTAE-commerce
loser

General: Potentially Confounded Button Color A/B Test

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the general isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTAE-commerce
winner

General: CTA Button Optimization

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the general isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTAE-commerce
loser

Product: CTA Button Optimization

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTAE-commerce
winner

Product: CTA Button Optimization

Problem: Each additional form field adds friction to the product, increasing the chance users abandon before completing their submission.

CTAE-commerce
winner

Product: Product Page

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTATravel
winner

Product: Product Page

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTAE-commerce
winner

Product: CTA Button Optimization

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTAE-commerce
loser

Listing: Listing Page — Ghost Buttons

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the listing isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTATravel
loser

Home landing: CTA Button Optimization

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the home landing isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTASaaS
winner

Product: Product Page

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTAE-commerce
winner

Signup: CTA Button Optimization

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the signup isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTATravel

Browse More

Run Better CTA Tests

Save your own experiments, get AI-powered test ideas, and build on patterns from 30+ real tests.

View Plans & Pricing