Skip to main content
loser

Product: Product Page

Hypothesis

If we test a similar change on our product pages as rejected, we should be cautious

LayoutProduct PageTravelindustry_leakairbnbloser

Test Results

Key Learning

Problem: This product has conversion optimization opportunities worth testing.

What was tried: rejected this UI change (Jun 4, 2019). Rejection suggests the change underperformed the control

Why it failed: The control was closer to optimal for this audience. Test more conservative variations next time.

How to Apply This to Your Site

This test showed that product: product page hurt conversions. The change was tested on a product page page in the travel industry. Avoid replicating this exact approach — instead, consider testing the opposite direction or a more subtle variation.

Before you test: Consider that layout tests typically require adequate traffic to reach statistical significance. Run your test for at least 2 full business cycles to account for weekly traffic patterns.

What Was Tested

Some months ago ran this experiment where they exposed a beautifully designed cancellation graph. The graph showed a series of refund scenarios someone might be eligible for relatively to the check-in date (usually shrinking over time). Fast track into the future and there is no more sign of this variant as it returned into its collapsed state hiding from view.

Methodology

Confidence Level
70%

Build On These Learnings

Save your own experiments, spot winning patterns across your test history, and stop repeating what's already been tried.

Related Experiments

Explore More Experiments