Skip to main content
inconclusive+3.3% lift

Landing Page: Grid Page Zip Modal Relevance

Copy & MessagingLanding PageEnergy & UtilitiesClarityRelevanceHeadlineCopyTest ArchiveMotivationValue StatementValue Proposition

Test Results

12.10%
Control CR
11.74%
Variant CR
21,639
Sample size
33
Days run
Control12.10%
Variant11.74%

Key Learning

Context: Capturing visitor attention on the landing page with modals or overlays is a balance between engagement and annoyance.

What was tested: A variation was tested against the existing experience.

Result: No statistically significant difference was detected. Inconclusive copy tests usually mean both versions are equally (in)effective at addressing user motivations. Try a fundamentally different angle.

How to Apply This to Your Site

This experiment tested landing page: grid page zip modal relevance but produced no statistically significant change. The test was run on a landing page page in the energy & utilities industry. Inconclusive results suggest this particular change may not be a priority — focus testing effort on higher-impact areas.

Before you test: Consider that copy & messaging tests typically require large sample sizes to detect small effects. This test ran for 33 days — plan for at least that long.

This result reached 95% statistical confidence, meaning there is a very low probability the observed effect was due to chance. Results at this confidence level are generally considered reliable for making business decisions.

What Was Tested

A/B test on landing page testing copy & messaging changes.

Methodology

Primary Metric
Transactions
Confidence Level
95%
Lift Range
1.3% to 5.3%

Build On These Learnings

Save your own experiments, spot winning patterns across your test history, and stop repeating what's already been tried.

Related Experiments

Explore More Experiments