Skip to main content
loser

Listing: Listing Page — Ghost Buttons

Hypothesis

If we test a similar change on our listing pages as rejected, we should be cautious

CTACategory PageTravelindustry_leakbookingcomlistingloser

Test Results

Key Learning

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the listing isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

What was tried: rejected this UI change (Jan 3, 2020). Rejection suggests the change underperformed the control

Why it failed: Not every CTA change improves conversion. Users may have preferred the original because it was clearer, more familiar, or better positioned.

How to Apply This to Your Site

This test showed that listing: listing page — ghost buttons hurt conversions. The change was tested on a category page page in the travel industry. Avoid replicating this exact approach — instead, consider testing the opposite direction or a more subtle variation.

Before you test: Consider that cta tests typically require adequate traffic to reach statistical significance. Run your test for at least 2 full business cycles to account for weekly traffic patterns.

What Was Tested

Ghosts buttons. We know that this style of buttons is net negative based on this evidence-based pattern. So when Booking ran this experiment, it's no surpirse that it was eventually rejected - a predictable replication.

Methodology

Confidence Level
70%

Build On These Learnings

Save your own experiments, spot winning patterns across your test history, and stop repeating what's already been tried.

Related Experiments

Explore More Experiments