Skip to main content
inconclusive+3.1% lift

Mobile: Force Mobile Chooser

Hypothesis

Forcing all users that enter the grid page to go through the mobile chooser to see if this increases overall conversion rate among audiences that maybe didn't find it in the former test.

LayoutMobileEnergy & UtilitiesundefinedundefinedundefinedTest ArchiveParadox of ChoiceUsabilityChoiceFindability

Test Results

16.11%
Control CR
16.61%
Variant CR
18,942
Sample size
42
Days run
Control16.11%
Variant16.61%

Key Learning

Context: Mobile users experience the mobile differently — smaller screens, touch targets, and limited attention require purpose-built design.

What was tested: Forcing all users that enter the grid page to go through the mobile chooser to see if this increases overall conversion rate among audiences that maybe didn't find it in the former test.

Result: No statistically significant difference was detected. No significant difference suggests users adapted to the change quickly, or the variation didn't address the actual friction point. Try testing more targeted elements.

How to Apply This to Your Site

This experiment tested mobile: force mobile chooser but produced no statistically significant change. The test was run on a mobile page in the energy & utilities industry. Inconclusive results suggest this particular change may not be a priority — focus testing effort on higher-impact areas.

Before you test: Consider that layout tests typically require large sample sizes to detect small effects. This test ran for 42 days — plan for at least that long.

This result reached 95% statistical confidence, meaning there is a very low probability the observed effect was due to chance. Results at this confidence level are generally considered reliable for making business decisions.

What Was Tested

Forcing all users that enter the grid page to go through the mobile chooser to see if this increases overall conversion rate among audiences that maybe didn't find it in the former test.

Methodology

Primary Metric
Transactions
Confidence Level
95%
Lift Range
1.1% to 5.1%

Build On These Learnings

Save your own experiments, spot winning patterns across your test history, and stop repeating what's already been tried.

Related Experiments

Explore More Experiments