Real experiments. Real outcomes. Actionable patterns. Browse A/B tests with problem-to-solution framing, results, and recommendations for what to test next.
Sticky mobile CTAs can compress time-on-page meaningfully (~15% faster) without sacrificing engagement signals — users converted at a directionally higher rate AND moved through the page faster, suggesting reduced hesitation rather than rushed clicks. The result was shipped via 90/10 holdout monitoring rather than traditional 50/50 A/B inference — the high baseline (~85%) and limited mobile traffic made full A/B underpowered, so the team chose a holdout-validated rollout as the deliberate methodology. Bayesian P(variant > control) was ~0.90, supporting the directional ship call. Worth noting: external research flags sticky CTAs as context-dependent — they help when the primary action is buried below the fold, but can hurt on shorter pages where the original CTA is already visible.
Problem: How prices are displayed on the pricing page directly influences perceived value and willingness to buy.
Problem: The primary call-to-action on the pricing page isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.
The story behind this win is the iteration discipline. The first attempt at this homepage redesign changed two systems at once (messaging + routing) and produced an ambiguous result: the entry metric moved slightly positive while downstream metrics moved meaningfully negative. The team correctly identified that the routing change — which inadvertently replaced direct links to a personalized plan-search experience with modal-driven entry into a generic flow — was the downstream killer. The iteration restored the original routing and kept ONLY the homepage hierarchy changes. All funnel metrics moved directionally positive in lockstep (entry +2.38%, mid-funnel +7%, conversion +11.81%) — none stat-sig individually but consistent enough across the funnel to justify shipping. Element-level diagnostics confirmed the mechanism: the segment CTAs the team intended to promote saw a 26-30% lift in unique-visitor interaction, while the unchanged hero banner stayed flat (as expected). Two key behavioral observations: (1) page-length reduction surfaced a 4x lift on a previously buried bottom-of-page zip code input — proving the secondary lesson that 'less page' can mean 'more conversion real estate'; (2) desktop strongly outperformed mobile, with the suspected cause being mobile's lead-with-form pattern (zip code above hero) — putting the form before the message creates friction. The broader transferable insight: when a messy test confounds multiple variables, the right move is to isolate one variable in the next test, not to abandon the hypothesis.
Problem: Users arriving at the mobile can't efficiently find what they're looking for, increasing bounce rates.
Problem: The information hierarchy on the homepage may not match how users actually scan and process the content.
Problem: The first screen of the landing page must immediately communicate value — if it doesn't, users bounce before scrolling.
Problem: Users on the landing page need validation from others before committing — without visible proof of success, they hesitate.
Problem: The primary call-to-action on the landing page isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.
Problem: Users on the landing page need validation from others before committing — without visible proof of success, they hesitate.
Problem: The information hierarchy on the homepage may not match how users actually scan and process the content.
Problem: The information hierarchy on the landing page may not match how users actually scan and process the content.
Problem: How prices are displayed on the product page directly influences perceived value and willingness to buy.
Problem: The first screen of the checkout must immediately communicate value — if it doesn't, users bounce before scrolling.
Problem: The information hierarchy on the homepage may not match how users actually scan and process the content.
Problem: The first screen of the homepage must immediately communicate value — if it doesn't, users bounce before scrolling.
Problem: Users can't quickly find relevant products or content on the landing page, leading to frustration and early exits.
Problem: Each additional form field adds friction to the pricing page, increasing the chance users abandon before completing their submission.
Problem: How "Us north address bar" is implemented on the landing page can meaningfully affect conversion — this element is worth testing.
Problem: The information hierarchy on the landing page may not match how users actually scan and process the content.
Build on what's already been learned. Save your own experiments, surface winning patterns, and make every test count.