Real experiments. Real outcomes. Actionable patterns. Browse A/B tests with problem-to-solution framing, results, and recommendations for what to test next.
Sticky mobile CTAs can compress time-on-page meaningfully (~15% faster) without sacrificing engagement signals — users converted at a directionally higher rate AND moved through the page faster, suggesting reduced hesitation rather than rushed clicks. The result was shipped via 90/10 holdout monitoring rather than traditional 50/50 A/B inference — the high baseline (~85%) and limited mobile traffic made full A/B underpowered, so the team chose a holdout-validated rollout as the deliberate methodology. Bayesian P(variant > control) was ~0.90, supporting the directional ship call. Worth noting: external research flags sticky CTAs as context-dependent — they help when the primary action is buried below the fold, but can hurt on shorter pages where the original CTA is already visible.
Problem: Coupon and promo code fields on checkouts can distract users — they leave to hunt for codes, reducing completion rates.
Problem: The primary call-to-action on the checkout isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.
Build on what's already been learned. Save your own experiments, surface winning patterns, and make every test count.