Skip to main content

The A/B Test Library

Real experiments. Real outcomes. Actionable patterns. Browse A/B tests with problem-to-solution framing, results, and recommendations for what to test next.

10 experiments
Winners, losers & inconclusive
Full statistical details
winner

Does Pinning a Mobile Checkout CTA Improve Conversion?

Sticky mobile CTAs can compress time-on-page meaningfully (~15% faster) without sacrificing engagement signals — users converted at a directionally higher rate AND moved through the page faster, suggesting reduced hesitation rather than rushed clicks. The result was shipped via 90/10 holdout monitoring rather than traditional 50/50 A/B inference — the high baseline (~85%) and limited mobile traffic made full A/B underpowered, so the team chose a holdout-validated rollout as the deliberate methodology. Bayesian P(variant > control) was ~0.90, supporting the directional ship call. Worth noting: external research flags sticky CTAs as context-dependent — they help when the primary action is buried below the fold, but can hurt on shorter pages where the original CTA is already visible.

CTAEnergy & Utilities
winner

Checkout: Filled Or Ghost Buttons

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the checkout isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTACross-Industry
winner

Product: Product Page

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTAE-commerce
winner

General: CTA Button Optimization

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the general isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTAE-commerce
winner

Product: CTA Button Optimization

Problem: Each additional form field adds friction to the product, increasing the chance users abandon before completing their submission.

CTAE-commerce
winner

Product: Product Page

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTATravel
winner

Product: Product Page

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTAE-commerce
winner

Product: CTA Button Optimization

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTAE-commerce
winner

Product: Product Page

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the product isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTAE-commerce
winner

Signup: CTA Button Optimization

Problem: The primary call-to-action on the signup isn't converting at its potential — design, copy, or placement may be the bottleneck.

CTATravel

Stop Re-Running Failed Tests

Build on what's already been learned. Save your own experiments, surface winning patterns, and make every test count.

Browse Experiments By

Comparisons

Popular Combos

Explore More